Home Page   -   Åditorial Board   -   Instructions to autors   -   Archive   -   Contact   -   Journal's Indexing UA   EN


Last issue

¹ 3 (116), 2025


Support

Edition of the journal is supported partially by the grant of the Fogarty International Center (FIC) of the National Institute of Health and Illinois University, Chicago.

JOURNAL

ISSN 2077-7477 (Print)
ISSN 2077-7485 (Online)

A journal "Dovkillia ta zdorovia" (Environment & Health) publishes the articles on the problems in the field of medical ecology, hygiene, health protection and ecological safety.

Founder of the Journal:
State Institution "O.M. Marzeiev Institute for Hygiene and Medical Ecology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"

Frequency of publication:
quarterly

Environment & HealthISSN: 2077-7477 eISSN: 2077-7485
No: 3 (112)   -   August, 2024   -   Pages: 10-16
Validity and reliability assessment of the RCADS-P-25 in the ukrainian population
Yelizarova O.T.1, Hozak S.V.1, Stankevich T.V.1, Parats A.M.1, Yelizarov V.O.2
1 State Institution "O.M. Marz³eiev Institute for Public Health of the NAMSU", Kyiv
2 Luxoft Ukrain, Kyiv

ÓÄÊ: 613.955:159.99:303

ABSTRACT:
Population studies often require assessing the mental state of children and adolescents. The Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-P-25) is an internationally recognized tool used to measure anxiety and depression levels in 8 to 18-years-old children and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the shortened version of the RCADS-P-25, completed by parents or guardians, for the Ukrainian population.

Materials and methods: The RCADS-25 tool was translated into Ukrainian and adapted for cultural relevance. Validity was assessed through factor analysis, and reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest analysis. The pilot study involved 763 parents, and 5,695 RCADS-P-25 scales were analyzed from 2020 to 2024.

Results: Factor analysis confirmed a two-factor structure consistent with the original version of the RCADS-P-25. The internal consistency was high, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 in 2020. The average Cronbach’s alpha from 2020 to 2024 was 0.88 (0.87-0.88; F=8.1; p<0.001). Test-retest analysis over two weeks showed stable results (ICC = 0.93-0.96).

Conclusions: The study concluded that the RCADS-P-25 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing anxiety and depressive disorders in Ukrainian children and adolescents aged 8-18.

KEYWORDS:
RCADS-P-25, schoolô-age children, parents, COVID-19 pandemic, war, mental health, psychometric parameters
REFERENCES:
1. Purtle J, Nelson KL, Counts NZ, Yudell M. Population-Based approaches to mental health: history, strategies, and evidence. Annual Review of Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41(1):201-21. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094247
2. Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents: helping adolescents thrive. Geneva. World Health Organization; 2020. 120 p. World Health Organization.
3. Piqueras JA, Martín-Vivar M, Sandin B, San Luis C, Pineda D. The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2017 Aug; 218:153-69. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.022
4. Klaufus L, Verlinden E, van der Wal M, Kösters M, Cuijpers P, Chinapaw M. Psychometric evaluation of two short versions of the revised child anxiety and depression scale. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 5;20(1). DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-2444-5
5. The common monitoring and evaluation framework for mental health and psychosocial support in emergency settings: with means of verification (version 2.0). Geneva: Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC); 3021. 124
6. Ebesutani C, Chorpita BF, Higa-McMillan CK, Nakamura BJ, Regan J, Lynch RE. A psychometric analysis of the revised child anxiety and depression scales-parent version in a school sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2010 Sep 29;39(2):173-85. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9460-8
7. Ebesutani C, Reise SP, Chorpita BF, Ale C, Regan J, Young J, Higa-McMillan C, Weisz JR. The revised child anxiety and depression scale-short version: scale reduction via exploratory bifactor modeling of the broad anxiety factor. Psychological Assessment. 2012;24(4):833-45. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027283
8. Raknes S, Chorna T. The Helping Hand in Ukraine: feasibility and potential impact. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2024 Jun 29;10(1). DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01520-5
9. Yelizarova O, Stankevych T, Parats A, Polka N, Lynchak O, Diuba N, Hozak S. The effect of two COVID-19 lockdowns on physical activity of school-age children. Sports Medicine and Health Science. 2022 Jan. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2022.01.002
10. Goretzko D, Siemund K, Sterner P. Evaluating model fit of measurement models in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2023 Apr 2:001316442311638. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644231163813
11. Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: new developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment. 2019 Dec; 31(12):1412-27. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
Designed by: IPH NAMSU © Environment & Health, 2006-2026. All rights reserved.
Use of text and graphic materials of the site is allowed only upon written permission of the editoral board.